The things in this monologue were probably the hardest things I've ever spoken about publicly.
Today, I open up and share my thoughts about memory, uncertainty and doubt in the ET contact experience, looking at two of my own experiences 23 years apart. I explore how contact with beings from elsewhere shatters your experience of reality and talk about why I think most people who have contact, avoid talking about uncertainty and doubt and why these things are really critical to making sense of the experience. I post this monologue with some hesitation but do so because I belive that we need to be as honest and transparent as we can be, if we are to truly understand the experience of human-ET contact.
There is some repetitive noise in the early part of the recording due to my shoes squeaking and the squeaking on my iPod cover.
I've tackled the subject of afterlife communication before (https://etandi.wordpress.com/2015/12/27/a-simple-method-for-meeting-the-dead/), so I thought I'd follow up with a basic introduction to the subject.
In today's monologue I introduce you to two methods for connecting with the dead (connecting with the deaaaaaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddddd !) - using internal hearing (a simple form of telepathy) and an internal space.
With these methods you will be able to establish clear contact with any person who wishes to speak to you from beyond the veil we call death.
You can learn more about the Internal Contact World Method here :
A couple of corrections are required for this monologue. Percy B. Shelley lived in the Pre-Victorian era (I think it was in the Edwardian era - King Edward). And during internal contact, strictly speaking you cannot maintain the Calm Abiding state but you can minimise internal noise (mental activity) and use Calm Abiding as a precursor to starting an internal world contact session.
More on Calm Abiding here :
Please note that Calm Abiding or any type of centered meditation that excludes all mental activity is not necessary for contacting the dead (or ETs) but it can be useful. Perhaps of greater use is the process of relaxation taught by Dr Ainslie Meares (one of my heroes) in his wonderful book Relief Without Drugs (page 90 something) https://www.amazon.com/Relief-without-drugs-Ainslie-Meares/dp/B0007FTOJQ / http://stillnessmeditation.com.au/dr-ainslie-meares/.
Copyright © 2009-2017 by Bright Garlick.
All Rights Reserved.
Www.etandi.wordpress.com Www.thesomethingmonologues.podbean.com .
I've had many talks with my ET friend Dude about the nature of reality and the self. In today's monologue I reflect on a recent talk, in which Dude put forward a metaphorical explanation for understanding all of a person's lives - their apparent past lives, future lives and parallel lives. I found Dude's explanation very confronting, especially when I sat down and thought about it's implications. It is my wish that Dude's explanation also pushes you way beyond your comfort zone. Dude offered this explanation, as an antidote to Buddhist ideas of a subtle self, reincarnating in and out of time.
And for those who may be wondering, Dude had a significant impact on my decision to abandon many Buddhist teachings and my beginning to question many of it's core doctrines.
Its is my wish that this monologue makes you deeply uncomfortable with many of our contemporary beliefs and encourages you to explore the potential implications of Dude's explanation. The implications are far reaching and potentially relate to everything that we know as reality.
This monologue might appeal to people with an interest in time travel, reincarnation, multiverses, the afterlife and the nature of the self.
In the first section of today's monologue I give you an update on a new treatment option I'm considering for my tumours. So you'll have to skip to the 19 minute mark to hear about Dude's ideas.
In this brief monologue, I explore how some ETs seem to be able to time travel and enter the afterlife. I offer a metaphor that I think might help you to make some sense of how they do this, using my own experiences with my ET friends as examples.
In this rather long monologue, I explore the idea of looking into the future through the lens of Probabilistic Topology/Topologies. This is a concept that actually exists. I'm not overly familiar with the mathematical interpretation of this, so I've used my own interpretation instead. The basic premise is that events in the future depend on certain probabilities, which create a certain shape for the future. These events can be known by the energetic signatures that they create, signatures whose probabilities in time, also have a particular shape. I could have used the term Topography but I think Topology is a better descriptor.
I give several examples of looking into the future, including certain things that were shared with me by deceased humans and ETs.
I ramble on a bit in this monologue and have a few lapses of memory - including saying Genpo instead of Roshi (old teacher/old master), when talking about attachment to roles, in reference to Ed Dames. There's a bit of wind here and there but you can hear most of the monologue clearly. The morning became colder with the approach of a rain front and my brain and body started to seize up a bit towards the end of the monologue. But I think this monologue will provide you with enough stimulus to make you consider seeing the future a little differently.